Why my geekbench score so low?

VIM4
1

Which system do you use? Android, Ubuntu, OOWOW or others?

Ubuntu 22.04 via oowow

Which version of system do you use? Khadas official images, self built images, or others?

Official image

Please describe your issue below:

I recently got Khadas vim4 and orange pi 5 and tried to bench test both system.

Vim4 is installed ubuntu 22.04 via oowow and apt upgraded to the latest.
Opi5 is installed ubuntu 20.04 image from their official web site.

I have tested with geekbench 5.4.4 for aarch64 version

And here is the result.
vim4 goes here: single 349, multi 1482

Opi5 goes here: single 590, multi 2516

VIM4 introduction page shows vim4 marked 1464 for single and 5388 for multi which is way above from both systems.

Is there any reason vim4 marked such low result?
What am I missing here?

2

The geekbench results on our website is based on Android, why you use geekbench on linux ? It’s not very useful.

3

Every benchmarks gives different results and can have hundreds of reasons why they differ.
Kernel version, software version, packages used, cooling, undervolting, bad settings, missing drivers, …
To say just a few.
I’ve got tons of benchmarks and learned how to read them and not put too much confidence in some weird results. Now on different RK3588 devices I get weird 7Z scores. Ones who are clocked higher perform worse, some single core scores ain’t great. But then with Blender al perform the same when the same blender version and distro version is used.

Board              | OS                            | Kernel         | Clockspeeds             | 7z b all cores     | 7z b core small core    | 7z b big core   | NicoD Blender    | Supertuxkart   | Memcpy         | Memset         | SBC-Bench
Khadas VIM2          Ubuntu 20.04 Gnome              5.18.0           1.4Ghz A53/1Ghz A53       7728                 900 (core 7)              1235 (core 0)     18m26s 2.79b       5fps             1617.5 MB/s      5099.7 MB/s      http://ix.io/4b4d
Khadas VIM2          Armbian Kinetic server          6.1.0-meson64    1.4Ghz A53/1Ghz A53       7867                                           1252 (core 0) 
Khadas VIM3          Ubuntu 20.04 Gnome              5.18.0           1.8Ghz A53/2.2Ghz A73     10300                1636 (core 0)             2417 (core 5)     9m38s  2.79b       19fps            4737.7 MB/s      8787.6 MB/s      http://ix.io/4b4S
Khadas VIM4          Ubuntu 22.04 Gnome              5.4.125          2.2Ghz A73/2Ghz A53       14138                1775 (core 7)             2299 (core 0)     5m46s              52fps            8094.0 MB/s      11649.7 MB/s     http://ix.io/4bkv
Khadas VIM4          Debian 10 xfce4                 5.4.125          2.2Ghz A73/2Ghz A53       15113                1830 (core 7)             2334 (core 0)     7m15s  2.79b                                                          http://ix.io/4blv
Station P1           Armbian Jammy xfce4             5.18.19          1.4Ghz A53/1.8Ghz A72     7607                 1248 (core 0)             1843 (core 5)     10m10s             7fps             1720.4 MB/s      7608.5 MB/s      http://ix.io/4b9f
Odroid N2+           Armbian Jammy xfce4             5.10.139         2Ghz A53/2.4Ghz A73       11755                1761 (core 0)             2518 (core 5)     5m53s              18fps            2155.7 MB/s      7664.6 MB/s      http://ix.io/4b9V
Odroid N2+           Armbian Kinetic server          6.1.0-meson64    2Ghz A53/2.4Ghz A73       11807                1764 (core 0)             2520 (core 5)     xxx                18fps
Odroid C2            Armbian kinetic server          6.1.0-meson64    1.5Ghz                    5173                 1320 (core 0)                           
Khadas Edge2         Ubuntu 22.04 Gnome              5.10.66          1.8Ghz A55/2.35Ghz*** A76 16901                1766 (core 0)             2930 (core 7)     3m25s              110fps (wayland)                                   http://ix.io/4e8w ****SBC-Bench broken big cores at 408Mhz
NanoPi R6S           Ubuntu 22.04 Gnome Headless     5.10.110         1.8Ghz A55/2.3Ghz *** A76 16385                1449 (core 0)             2493 (core 7)     3m27s              110fps (wayland)                                   http://ix.io/4gSl
OPi800               OrangeOS xfce4                  5.18.5           1.4Ghz A53/1.8Ghz A72     7475                 1283 (core 0)             1906 (core 5)     xxx                7fps
OPi800               Armbian Jammy xfce4             5.19.16          1.4Ghz A53/1.8Ghz A72     7686                 1241 (core 0)             1841 (core 5)     10m11s             7fps                                               http://ix.io/4eiS
Radxa Zero           Armbian Kinetic server          6.1.0-meson64    1.8Ghz A53                6301                 1601 (core 0)                               
Banana Pi M5         Armbian Sid xfce4               5.19.14-meson64  2.1Ghz A55                7235                 1900 (core 0)                               xxx                4fps             3360.0 MB/s      5105.6 MB/s      http://ix.io/4cWz
Banana Pi M5         Armbian Jammy xfce4             5.19.15-meson64  2.1Ghz A55                7278                 1923 (core 0)                               16m37s             
MangoPi MQ Pro       Armbian Jammy xfce4             5.19             1Ghz C906                 573                  573                                         8h34m              No 3d GPU                                          
MangoPi MQ Pro       Armbian Jammy headless          5.19             1Ghz C906                 602                  602                                         7h44m                                                                 http://ix.io/4cil
Raspberry Pi Zero    Raspberry Pi OS lxde armhf      5.15             1Ghz                      427                  427                                              
Raspberry Pi Zero    Raspberry Pi OS headless armhf  5.15             1Ghz                      614                  614

Here the RK3588 results.



Board              | OS                            | Kernel         | Clockspeeds             | 7z b all cores     | 7z b core small core    | 7z b big core   | NicoD Blender    | Supertuxkart        | SBC-Bench
Radxa Rock 5B        Armbian Jammy cinnamon          5.10.110         1.8Ghz A55/2.4Ghz A76     15996                1533 (core 0)             2651 (core 7)     3m25s              65fps (panfork)       http://ix.io/4jOb
Khadas Edge2         Ubuntu 22.04 Gnome              5.10.66          1.8Ghz A55/2.35Ghz* A76   16901                1766 (core 0)             2930 (core 7)     3m25s              110fps (wayland)      http://ix.io/4e8w ****SBC-Bench broken big cores at 408Mhz
NanoPi R6S           Ubuntu 22.04 Gnome Headless     5.10.110         1.8Ghz A55/2.3Ghz * A76   16385                1449 (core 0)             2493 (core 7)     3m27s              110fps (wayland)      http://ix.io/4gSl
NanoPi R6S           Debian Buster lxde              5.10.110         1.8Ghz A55/2.3Ghz * A76   16124                1567 (core 0)             2566 (core 7)     4m34s              xxx                   xxx
Mekotronics R58      Debian Bullseye wayland         5.10.110         1.8Ghz A53/2.2Ghz A76     16803                1777 (core 0)             2879 (core 1)     4m35s              110fps (wayland)      http://ix.io/4j40
Mekotronics R58      Ubuntu 20.04 x11                5.10.66          1.8Ghz A53/2.2Ghz A76     16477                1765 (core 0)             2897 (core 1)     5m53s V2.82        4fps (llvmpipe)
1 Like
4

Because I am trying to run ROS 2 on linux for robotics application. There is no way to run ROS on android right?

5

Yes, but no need to care about the geekbench scores on linux.