@Frank I loaded the image LibreELEC-RK3399.aarch64-9.1-devel-20190606140016-a41fdf1-khadas-edge.img
which only has rk3399-khadas-edge.dtb
available on my Edge-V, which is set in extlinux.conf
. I cannot access the console using CTRL+ALT+F3, and SSH is very difficult to use. In fact, this particularly time, I couldn’t even successfully launch a shell with SSH and half the time it wouldn’t prompt for a password. I tried at least 15 times. However, pinging from another system on my network I see lots of packet loss:
$ ping 192.168.0.234
PING 192.168.0.234 (192.168.0.234): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.234: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.265 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.234: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.767 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.234: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.768 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
64 bytes from 192.168.0.234: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.444 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.234: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.501 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.234: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.810 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 7
64 bytes from 192.168.0.234: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.568 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 9
Request timeout for icmp_seq 10
Request timeout for icmp_seq 11
Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
^C
--- 192.168.0.234 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 50.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.444/0.732/1.265/0.255 ms
Additionally, it took 3 times to boot successfully using this image. The first two times it had some weird stack trace message scrolling by too rapidly to read.
Moving on to @balbes150’s questions. Here is the extlinux.conf
I was using:
LABEL LibreELEC
LINUX /KERNEL
# FDT /dtb/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtb
FDT /dtb/rk3399-khadas-edgev-linux.dtb
APPEND boot=LABEL=LIBREELEC disk=LABEL=STORAGE quiet console=uart8250,mmio32,0xff1a0000 console=tty0 coherent_pool=2M
I have not previously tried the images you listed, so I’m trying them now.
Using image LibreELEC-RK3399.arm-9.1-devel-20190517110312-a41fdf1-khadas-edge.img
and its default extlinux.conf
I have the same problems with the network. It also does not have an Edge-V specific DTB file to use.
Using image LibreELEC-RK3399.aarch64-9.1-devel-20190517102030-a41fdf1-khadas-edge.img
, which also does not have an Edge-V specific DTB, I have the same network problems (50% packet loss, unusable SSH). However, by random chance, I was able to launch a shell via SSH and executed @Frank’s commands:
LibreELEC (community): devel-20190517102030-a41fdf1 (RK3399.aarch64)
LibreELEC:~ # ping www.baidu.com
PING www.baidu.com (104.193.88.123): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=1 ttl=52 time=45.488 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=5 ttl=52 time=45.467 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=8 ttl=52 time=45.141 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=9 ttl=52 time=45.450 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=13 ttl=52 time=45.323 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=15 ttl=52 time=45.383 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=17 ttl=52 time=45.271 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=18 ttl=52 time=45.319 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=19 ttl=52 time=45.308 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=21 ttl=52 time=45.403 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=23 ttl=52 time=45.429 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=28 ttl=52 time=45.174 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=29 ttl=52 time=45.586 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=31 ttl=52 time=45.080 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=32 ttl=52 time=45.273 ms
64 bytes from 104.193.88.123: seq=34 ttl=52 time=45.544 ms
^C
--- www.baidu.com ping statistics ---
35 packets transmitted, 16 packets received, 54% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 45.080/45.352/45.586 ms
and:
LibreELEC:~ # cd /media
LibreELEC:/var/media # time wget http://cn.wordpress.org/wordpress-3.1-zh_CN.zip
Connecting to cn.wordpress.org (198.143.164.252:80)
Connecting to cn.wordpress.org (198.143.164.252:443)
wget: error getting response: Connection reset by peer
Command exited with non-zero status 1
real 1m 40.01s
user 0m 0.00s
sys 0m 0.00s
Note: All of my tests were performed using Ethernet. As mentioned previously, I’ve tried different cables, switches, WiFi, etc. and have the same issues reported. Furthermore, the same Ethernet cable, switches, ports, etc. work just fine using the Edge_Ubuntu-server-bionic_Linux-4.4_arm64_SD-USB_V20181115.img
image.